Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Richard & John Stegemann

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1909No. Civ. No. 552PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. G. A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Appeal from judgment against defendants and •order denying defendants’ motion for a new-trial.

The action was brought by plaintiffs, as the lessors, to recover rent for certain premises, situate in the city and county of San Francisco, let to the Stegemanns. The San Francisco Breweries, Limited, guaranteed the payment of the rent and other covenants to be performed by Stegemann Bros.

No issue is made in the pleadings as to the execution of the lease, which is set forth in full in the pleadings.

The lease contains the following provision: ‘ ‘ The said parties of the second part [lessees] agree…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Kreamer v. EarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Chateau v. SinglaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Ex parte StephenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Vick v. PattersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Grace v. CroningerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Smith v. California Thorn Cordage, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Burke v. San Francisco Breweries, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Brenner v. HaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API