Legal Opinion
In re Lawrence
California Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1886No. 20111PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The petitioner was arrested on a warrant issued from a Justice’s Court of Stanislaus County on a charge of misdemeanor, under section 435, Penal Code, and is held in custody under that warrant by the sheriff of said county.
*609He was alleged to be carrying on the business of a liquor «dealer without having first procured a license authorizing him so to do, as required by an ordinance of the board of supervisors of said county.
It is admitted that he is carrying on that business in the city of Modesto and county aforesaid, and that he has not paid the license required by said county…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- People v. FergusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Ex parte WoltersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by16 opinions
- Country of Plumas v. WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Ex parte MansfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ex Parte RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- County of Monterey v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.