Kreamer v. Earl
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This is an action to compel the defendant Earl to convey to plaintiff, who is special administrator of the estate of Henry Charles, deceased, the legal title to the northeast quarter of the northwest quarter of section 22, township 8 south, range 8 west, San Bernardino meridian, and to cancel a mortgage thereon given by Earl to his co-defendant Egan.
The facts found by the court show that in September, 1875, Henry Charles and F. P. Forster, brother of defendant M. A. Forster, claimed the right adversely to each other to acquire the title to several tracts of public land, including the land in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Valentine v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Brake v. BallouSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Damrell v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Manley v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- McGregor v. DonellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Gantt v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Reed v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.