Legal Opinion

Chateau v. Singla

California Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1896No. 73PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. A. A. Sanderson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The action is a proceeding in equity by one partner to dissolve a copartnership between -himself and defendant, for the appointment of a receiver, for a statement of accounts, and generally for the closing up of the business of the partnership. In the complaint it is averred that the partnership was formed for the business “ of subletting and renting certain tenements, and in supplying and furnishing the necessary household furniture therein to fit the same for habitations and dwellings for human beings.” Further averments of the complaint were that the defendant had excluded plaintiff from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Estate of GroomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Wise v. RadisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Colby v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Morey v. PaladiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API