Legal Opinion
Aimcor v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided December 29, 1995No. Consolidated Court No. 93-06-00322PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
DiCarlo, Chief Judge:
Plaintiffs, domestic manufacturers of ferrosili-con, move for judgment upon the agency record pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2, contesting certain parts of the final redetermination on remand of the United States Department of Commerce. See Final Results of Remand Determination Pursuant to Court Remand, Aimcor v. United States No. 93-06-00322 (Mar. 30, 1995) [hereinafter Remand Determination]. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(a)(2) (1994) and 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c) (1988).
Background
Plaintiffs filed a countervailing duty petition…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- U.H.F.C. Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. And American Alloys, Inc. v. The United States, and Cvg-Venezolana De Ferrosilicio, C.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- AIMCOR, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Aimcor v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. Unitd StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.