Legal Opinion
Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc. And American Alloys, Inc. v. The United States, and Cvg-Venezolana De Ferrosilicio, C.A.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 9, 1998No. 97-1266PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment entered 31 December 1996 by the United States Court of International Trade in a countervailing duties case, No. 93-06-00322, involving fer-rosilicon imported from Venezuela. The Court of International Trade sustained a Second Remand Determination of the International Trade Administration of the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”), which found a- eountervailable subsidy rate. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm-in-part, reverse-in-part, and remand.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs-Appellees, Aimcor, Alabama Silicon, Inc., and American…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Koyo Seiko Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Cabot Corporation v. The United States, Hules Mexicanos, S.A. And Negromex, S.A., Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Nsk Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- AK Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- SKF USA Inc. v. INA Walzlager Schaeffler KGCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- AIMCOR, Alabama Silicon, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.