Legal Opinion

Deary v. Town of Dudley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 17, 1961PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

The petitioners, fifteen taxable inhabitants of the town of Dudley, bring this petition under Gr. L. e. 40, §53.

The averments of the petition are as follows: The respondent town, through its sewer commissioners, on June 2 and June 9,1960, caused an invitation for bids to be advertised in connection with the proposed installation of sewers (called contract #14) on Pattison Avenue, Conant Avenue, and Hall Road in the town. On June 16,1960, bids (two in number) duly received in conformity with the invitation were opened, and it appeared that one was by LaPlante Bros, for $36,862, and the other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Larkin v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. Archambault v. Mayor of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gil-Bern Construction Corp. v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  2. Datatrol Inc. v. State Purchasing AgentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  3. C & T Associates, Inc. v. Government of New Castle CountyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1979
  4. J. D'Amico, Inc. v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  5. Modern Continental Construction Co. v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API