Legal Opinion
Larkin v. County Commissioners
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 5, 1931PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
These two proceedings, one a petition for a writ of mandamus and the other a suit in equity, have the same object. They are brought to compel the defendants as county commissioners for the county of Middlesex to award to one of the plaintiffs a certain contract for the doing of plumbing work in connection with the construction of a new house of correction for the said county under the provisions of St. 1929, c. 381. They are brought under G. L. c. 34, § 17, as amended by St. 1922, c. 383. So far as material that section requires that contracts such as the contract here in question shall be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morse v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Duffy v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Edge Moor Bridge Works v. County of BristolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- People ex rel. Putnam v. Commissioners of Buffalo CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1875
- Sweezey v. Mayor of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Stockus v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Gifford v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Plumer v. Houghton & Dutton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.