J. D'Amico, Inc. v. City of Worcester
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
Although the parties were insistent at oral argument that the question they pose regarding the application of G. L. c. 30, § 39M, perplexes and concerns the construction industry and public bidding authorities, we think there is less to the problem than meets the eye. The failure of the appellant, A. Amorello & Sons, Inc. (Amorello), as a bidder for a general contract to build a sewer interceptor, to make a bid deposit “in an amount not less than five percent of the value of the proposed, work, as estimated by the awarding authority'' 2 was a material deviation from bidding procedures which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Phipps Products Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Gil-Bern Construction Corp. v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Chick's Construction Co. v. Wachusett Regional High School District School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- James Construction Co. v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
- Department of Labor & Industries v. Boston Water & Sewer CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sciaba Construction Corp. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
- Petricca Construction Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Perlera v. Vining Disposal Service, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- E. Amanti & Sons, Inc. v. Town of BarnstableMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Thorn Transit Systems International, Ltd. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.