Legal Opinion

Modern Continental Construction Co. v. City of Lowell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 14, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

The city of Lowell (Lowell) and P. Gioioso & Sons, Inc. (Gioioso), sought relief in the Appeals Court, pursuant to the first paragraph of G. L. c. 231, § 118, from a preliminary injunction issued by a Superior Court judge in an action by The Modem Continental Construction Co., Inc. (Modem Continental). The preliminary injunction restrains Lowell from awarding a contract to Gioioso or any other party for the construction of a regional and municipal interceptor2 until the project is rebid in accordance with the requirements of G. L. c. 149, §§ 44A-44H. A single justice of the Appeals Court…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Morse v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Interstate Engineering Corp. v. City of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Cochran v. RoemerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Paul Sardella Construction Co. v. Braintree Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Computer Shoppe, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  2. Professional Services Group, Inc. v. Town of RocklandDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
  3. Modern Continental Construction Co. v. LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. North American Expositions Co. v. CorcoranMassachusetts Superior Court · 2005
  5. A&A Window Products, Inc. v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Superior Court · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API