Legal Opinion
Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Board of Appeal
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 10, 1929PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
These are petitions for writs of certiorari. Their object is to review the proceedings of the respondent board in voting to vary the application of St. 1924, c. 488, as amended, being the zoning law of the city of Boston, in accordance with the petition of one Daley. His application for a permit to erect stores on land within a general residence district having been denied by the building commissioner on the ground that it would be in violation of St. 1924, c. 488, § 4, Daley appealed to the respondent board as provided in § 19 of said chapter. He petitioned the respondent board to vary the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bradley v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Prusik v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Bemis v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Stevenson v. DonnellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Patterson v. PendexterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Morrison v. Selectmen of WeymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Whitney v. Judge of the District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Sweeney v. Morey & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Cappuccio v. Zoning Board of Appeals of SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Knowlton v. Town of SwampscottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.