Legal Opinion
Archambault v. Mayor of Lowell
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 1, 1932PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
This bill in equity was brought by ten or more taxpayers of the city of Lowell under G. L. c.,40, § 53, to restrain the mayor, the city treasurer, the city auditor and the board of health from expending money under a contract for ambulance service awarded to the J. H. Sparks Company, and for other relief, on the ground that the contract was illegal. The case was referred to a master by an order of reference which did not require a report of evidence. See Dobias v. Faldyn, ante, 52, 56. He made a report to which the plaintiffs filed objections. By an interlocutory decree these objections —…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clarke v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Safford v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- United States Drainage & Irrigation Co. v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Sweezey v. Mayor of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Larkin v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Stockus v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Gifford v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Urban Transport, Inc. v. Mayor of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Datatrol Inc. v. State Purchasing AgentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Slocum v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.