Legal Opinion
Saxon v. DuBois
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 19, 1962No. Civ. 20301PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.
A spring and a rivulet which are on lands of appellant, Althea DuBois, are the subjects of this litigation. Respondents, the plaintiffs, are Lawrence Daut and his daughters, Mrs. Saxon, Mrs. Saunders and Mrs. Sehorlig, who are the owners of property adjoining that of defendant-appellant. Mr. Daut is the operator of the property and the party plaintiff who has taken the lead in the litigation. He was the original owner of the land now owned by Mrs. DuBois, this land then being the southerly part of his holdings. He conveyed this southerly part to Edward C. Teague in 1932, Teague conveyed it to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Follette v. Pacific Light & Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Scheerer v. CuddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Beverly Hills National Bank & Trust Co. v. SeresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brewer v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Shupe v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Rogers v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Peterson v. First National Bank of LanderWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Kraemer v. Superior Oil CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.