Ihrig v. Bussell
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered February 10, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action upon a replevin bond, after a trial to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
On December 4, 1905, one Thomas Carstens, then owning certain personal property, consisting of bedroom suits and furnishings, made a conditional sale of the same to the appellant, Carrie Ihrig, for the sum of $5,600. Of the purchase price, $1,600 was paid at the time the contract was entered into, and the balance, $4,000, was agreed to be paid in installments of $150 each, on the first day of *71each month, commencing with the month of January, 1906. The contract of sale was put in writing and duly recorded. The contract was subsequently assigned by Carstens to one J. O. Bruggemann, and by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thomas v. IrwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Vinyard v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Colorado Springs Co. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1880
- Clark v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
- Mitchum v. StantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Apgar v. Great American Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
- Peacock v. KirklandOregon Supreme Court · 1915
- Securities Inv. Co. v. Pioneer Sales Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
- Wyatt v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Fergus Motor Co. v. SchottMontana Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.