Legal Opinion

Apgar v. Great American Indemnity Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1933No. 24020. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This is an action to recover upon a replevin bond. Trial before the court without a jury resulted in a judgment for defendant, from which plaintiff has appealed.

In February, 1931, one O. E. Lake brought an action in replevin against Mrs. Alba Apgar, appellant herein, to recover certain personal property sold under conditional sales contract, upon which forfeiture had been declared by Lake against Mrs. Apgar. A statutory bond was given, upon which the respondent herein became surety. The bond contained the following provision :

“That if the plaintiff [C. E. Lake in said replevin action] shall…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ihrig v. BussellWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Wisconsin Livestock Ass'n v. BowermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Womack v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Seiu Healthcare Nw Training Partnership v. Evergreen Freedom FoundationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. SWEETEN v. LAWSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
  4. Kegerreis v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Selland v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API