Legal Opinion

Fergus Motor Co. v. Schott

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1933No. 7,103PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Fergus Motor Company, a corporation, and against the defendants, Boyal Schott, as principal, and Lee B. Davis and Bert H. Benson, as sureties on an undertaking on claim and delivery.

On June 7, 1927, this plaintiff secured the assignment to it of a conditional sales contract from the Jones Motor Company, of Lewistown, to one Budolph Schott, and then commenced an action in debt against Schott, and caused .the sheriff, Guy Tullock, to seize the automobile described in the sales contract, by virtue of a writ of attachment issued in the action.

On…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dilworth v. McKelvySupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  2. Faulkner v. First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Mills v. GleasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Barrett v. ShipleyMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Cox v. SargentColorado Court of Appeals · 1897

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Graham v. Superior MinesMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Roper v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API