Legal Opinion

Wyatt v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 28, 1939No. 34,142PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action by a trustee in bankruptcy to recover damages from a surety on a replevin bond. The principal, Joseph Duncan, in the replevin action had sold a stock of furniture and fixtures to L. E. Smith and W. H. Hollis, Jr., partners, under an unrecorded conditional sales contract. Prior to the filing of the petition in bankruptcy of the vendees, the vendor obtained possession of the stock and fixtures in a replevin suit, sold the property under the terms of the contract, and dismissed the replevin suit. In the instant case the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Baker Ice MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Humphrey v. TatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Finance & Guaranty Co. v. OppenhimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Linn County Bank v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crosswhite v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Quinn, Trustee v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  3. Mohn v. Zahner Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API