Vinyard v. Barnes
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Piatt ■county; the Hon. James F. Hughes, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield
The question is presented by the rulings below, whether, ■under a replevin bond, conditioned that “the plaintiffs shall prosecute their suit to effect, and without delay, and make return of the said property, if return thereof shall be awarded, ” "there can be a recovery of the value of the property replevied, without proof of a judgment awarding its return. The principle, that the undertaking of a surety is construed strictly, :and can not be varied or enlarged by judicial construction, (Mix v. Singleton, 86 Ill. 194,) would seem to require that a negative answer be given, unless the duty to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thomas v. IrwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Warner v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
- Mix v. SingletonIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Brown v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1840
- Clark v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Smith v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- O'Berry v. O'BerryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- People ex rel. Williams v. GlasgowIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Danford v. WatkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
- Ihrig v. BussellWashington Supreme Court · 1912
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.