Legal Opinion

Vinyard v. Barnes

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1888PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Piatt ■county; the Hon. James F. Hughes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

The question is presented by the rulings below, whether, ■under a replevin bond, conditioned that “the plaintiffs shall prosecute their suit to effect, and without delay, and make return of the said property, if return thereof shall be awarded, ” "there can be a recovery of the value of the property replevied, without proof of a judgment awarding its return. The principle, that the undertaking of a surety is construed strictly, :and can not be varied or enlarged by judicial construction, (Mix v. Singleton, 86 Ill. 194,) would seem to require that a negative answer be given, unless the duty to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. IrwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Warner v. MatthewsIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Mix v. SingletonIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Brown v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1840
  5. Clark v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  2. O'Berry v. O'BerryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  3. People ex rel. Williams v. GlasgowIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Danford v. WatkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Ihrig v. BussellWashington Supreme Court · 1912

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API