Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Irwin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 10,114PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Bartholomew Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The case made by the complaint of appellees, shortly stated, is this: Irwin and Smith recovered judgments against William McEwen, executions were issued and levied upon a field of growing corn and other personal property. Mary McEwen instituted an action of replevin and gave the bond upon which this action is founded; such proceedings were had in the action of replevin as resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendants, therein for the corn, but no provision was made adjudging a return of the prop*558erty, although the verdict found that the defendants were entitled to a return. Prior to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Lapping v. DuffyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Toles v. . AdeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Nave v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Kelley v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1871

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. McIntosh v. ZaringIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Ervin v. State ex rel. WalleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Holzman v. HibbenIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Vinyard v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  5. American Plate Glass Co. v. NicosonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API