Legal Opinion

Bike v. American Motors Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1984No. Civ. A. No. 81-2510PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident. She initially brought suit against defendant American Motors Corporation (AMC) and Albert J. Kuklis. AMC is the manufacturer of the Jeep in which plaintiff was a passenger and Kuklis is the administrator of the estate of the deceased driver of that same vehicle. Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the estate as a defendant to preserve this Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. Thereafter, AMC filed a motion to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party. We denied that motion in our…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Field v. Volkswagenwerk AGCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Edward Rabatin v. Columbus Lines, Inc. And Union Carbide Corporation. Appeal of Columbus Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  3. Svetz for Svetz v. Land Tool Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Staymates v. ITT Holub IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Pitcavage v. Mastercraft Boat Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API