Legal Opinion

Struss v. Renault U.S.A., Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 85-365PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SIMMONS, District Judge.

This is an action filed by Karl K. Struss, Sr., on behalf of his two minor children who were injured in a motor vehicle accident on November 14, 1983. Said minors were passengers in a 1981 Renault Le Car sedan operated by Christina M. Struss.1 The action was brought against Renault U.S.A., Inc., American Motors Corporation, and American Motor Sales Corporation (“Original Defendants”) alleging that the minors’ injuries were caused by the defective condition and design of the Renault Le Car. Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that the Renault Le Car was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Huddell v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. One 1977 Mercedes Benz, 450 SEL, VIN 11603302064538Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Lasprogata v. QuallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Watergate Landmark Condominium Unit Owners' Ass'n v. Wiss, Janey, Elstner Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
  2. Resolution Trust Corp. v. FarmerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Mills v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Harries v. General Motors Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API