Legal Opinion

Carter v. Anika Manufacturing Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 69-1758PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WOOD, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the motion of Maxwell Industries, Inc., (Maxwell) to vacate our order granting leave to Anika Manufacturing Corp. (Anika) to institute a third-party complaint against Maxwell and to dismiss the third-party complaint.

This cause of action was instituted by Mrs. Margaretta Conderman Carter on July 10, 1969, for injuries sustained when her dress ignited at a dinner party. She sued four defendants, including Anika who was alleged to be the manufacturer of the dress. Anika filed an answer to plaintiff's complaint on October 20,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gilpin v. AbrahamDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Oberholtzer v. ScrantonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Jagielski v. Package Machine Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Afif v. RMI Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. United States v. New Castle CountyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1986
  5. Kubik v. GoldfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API