Legal Opinion

Flournoy v. State of California

California Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1962No. Sac. 7364PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

The State of California, the Department of Public Works, and the Division of Highways were joined with other defendants in an action brought by the husband and children of a woman killed in an automobile accident.

A general demurrer was sustained to plaintiffs’ complaint, and they have appealed from the ensuing judgment of dismissal which was entered on September 22, 1960.

During the pendency of the appeal Muskopf v. Corning Hospital Dist., 55 Cal.2d 211 [11 Cal.Rptr. 89, 359 P.2d 457], was decided. It held that the doctrine of governmental immunity could no longer be used to shield an entity…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Corning Hospital District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Chafor v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Lonberg v. City of RiversideDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API