Lonberg v. City of Riverside
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
PROCEEDINGS: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT CITY OF RIVERSIDE’S MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 56
TIMLIN, District Judge.
The court, Judge Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered defendant City of Riverside (the “City”)’s motions (the “Motions”) for partial summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 (“Rule 56”), Plaintiff John Lonberg (“Plaintiff’)’s oppositions, and the City’s replies.
The City filed two motions. One motion is for partial summary judgment on the issue whether Plaintiff is entitled as a matter of law to multiple statutory damages under California…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Andrea Dworkin Priscilla Moree Judith Fouts v. Hustler Magazine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Munson v. Del Taco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Wilkins-Jones v. County of AlamedaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Sarmiento v. Sealy, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Cornejo v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Mays v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.