Legal Opinion

Craig v. Zelian

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1902No. Sac. No. 966PublishedCited by 60 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for the breach of an agreement for the conveyance of real property. At the close of the plaintiffs’ case the court ordered a nonsuit, and from the judgment entered thereon the plaintiffs have appealed.

An agreement for the sale of real property must not only be in writing and subscribed by the party to be charged, but the writing must also contain such a description of the property agreed to be sold, either in terms or by reference, that it can be ascertained without resort to parol evidence. Parol evidence may be resorted to for the purpose of…

2Cited by60 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Ellis v. KlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Allen v. KitchenIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1955

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API