Grotheer v. Meyer Rosenberg, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
Plaintiffs seek by this action to hold the defendant Meyer Rosenberg, Inc., liable for the payment of a money judgment previously obtained by plaintiffs against the defendant Meyer Rosenberg, individually, upon the ground that said corporation is the alter ego of Meyer Rosenberg, individually. At the time of the commencement of the action they secured a writ of attachment which they caused to be levied on a bank account of $624.33 standing in the name of said corporation. Thereafter the corporation moved to dissolve the attachment, and pursuant to said motion an order was entered vacating,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Stanford Hotel Co. v. M. Schwind Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Llewellyn Iron Works v. Abbott Kidney Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- D. N. & E. Walter & Co. v. ZuckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilson v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Shea v. LeonisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Christensen v. Nugget Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944
- Korea Water Resources Corp. v. Chong Sung LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Castellini v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.