Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Stearns

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 1954No. Civ. 19711PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff, a licensed real estate broker, from an adverse judgment in an action to recover commissions from defendants.

The record reveals that defendant George Stearns was a subdivider of tract properties. On January 13, 1947, plaintiff prepared and submitted to defendant Stearns a written contract, the pertinent portions of which read as follows:

“For and in consideration of services to be performed by Roscoe J. Wilson, hereinafter called Agent, I (we) hereby employ said Agent as my (our) sole and exclusive agent to sell or exchange for me (us) that said real property…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brooks v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Gatti v. Highland Park Builders, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Tri-Q, Inc. v. Sta-Hi Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Magill v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Frank McCleary Cattle Company v. SewellNevada Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Hennessey's Tavern, Inc. v. American Air Filter Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API