Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Howard Park Co. v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 1953No. Civ. 19640PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.

Petitioners are the owners of a tract of land zoned for and being used for oil production purposes, a portion of the tract lying within the boundaries of a sanitary sewer district created pursuant to section 5000 et seq. of the Streets and Highways Code (formerly the Improvement Act of 1911), and known as the Athens Boulevard and Vermont Avenue Sewer District. Meriwether Investment Company has bought or undertaken to buy bonds to be issued for the financing of a sewer system in the district.

Petitioners sought a writ of mandate, alleging that the assessments against their property for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Rutledge v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Hadley v. DagueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Butters v. City of OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Highland Development Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. White v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Jeffery v. City of SalinasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Weitz v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. City of Plymouth v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API