Legal Opinion

Gilbert C. Brown v. Joan Palmateer, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 17, 2004No. 03-35618PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge GOODWIN; Dissent by Judge TALLMAN.

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Gilbert C. Brown alleges that his constitutional rights were violated when a statute, enacted after the commission of his crimes, was applied by the Oregon State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (“Board”) to postpone his parole release date. He contends that this violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause constitutes a constitutional injury that compels reversal of the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus. We agree.

BACKGROUND

I. Oregon’s Statutory Scheme for Postponing Parole Release

B…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Marc A. Burnett v. Robert O. Lampert Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Moor v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Thomas v. CateDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. Biggs v. Secretary of the California Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Chris Francis Williams v. Ernest Roe, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API