Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Cate
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 19, 2010No. 1:05-cv-1198PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PETITIONER’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO SUBSTITUTE RESPONDENT
JOHN M. DIXON, United States Magistrate Judge.
Procedural Background
Petitioner Brian Thomas (“Petitioner”) is a state prisoner proceeding with a peti tion for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
On March 19, 2009, the Court scheduled an evidentiary hearing in this matter in order to permit Petitioner to present evidence that article V, section 8(b) of the California Constitution created a significant risk of prolonging Petitioner’s…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Office of Citizens' Aide/Ombudsman v. Deb Edwards and Iowa Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Estate of Levingston v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Reid v. Cumberland CountyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Desert Survivors v. US Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Moriah v. Bank of China Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.