Legal Opinion
Marc A. Burnett v. Robert O. Lampert Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 27, 2005No. 04-35305PublishedCited by 138 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
The Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (“Board”) twice deferred Marc Alan Burnett’s scheduled parole release date. Burnett argues that the Board’s deferrals were unconstitutional and directly resulted in his suffering three years and eight months of unlawful imprisonment.
Burnett challenged the deferrals directly in state court and then with a habeas corpus petition in federal district court. While his federal habeas petition was pending, he was released on parole. Before the' district court considered his petition, however, Burnett violated the conditions…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by138 opinions
- Maxwell Hoffman v. Arvon J. Arave, Warden, Idaho Maximum Security Institution, Department of Correction, State of IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Milot v. HawsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Thomas v. YatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
- Cobos v. UngerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2008
- Ledesma v. MarshallDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.