Legal Opinion

Woodford v. Visciotti

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 4, 2002No. 02-137PublishedCited by 2,140 opinions

1Per curiam

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the grant of habeas relief to respondent John Visci-otti after concluding that he had been prejudiced by ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. 288 F. 3d 1097 (2002). Because this decision exceeds the limits imposed on federal habeas review by 28 U. S. C. § 2254(d), we reverse.

I

Respondent and a co-worker, Brian Hefner, devised a plan to rob two fellow employees, Timothy Dykstra and Michael Wolbert, on November 8, 1982, their payday. They invited the pair to join them at a party. As the four were driving to that supposed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2,140 opinions

  1. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003

2,135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API