Legal Opinion

Chris Francis Williams v. Ernest Roe, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 2005No. 03-56064PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Chris Francis Williams appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Williams challenges under the Ex Post Facto Clause the state court’s application of an amended version of California Penal Code § 654. The amended statute eliminated judicial discretion to impose a lower sentence afforded by the version in place at the time of Williams’ offense. We hold that application of the amended statute was an ex post facto violation.

Further, under our case law, such an error requires reversal without inquiring into its harmfulness. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bryan F. Jennings v. James McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Williams v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  3. People v. DelgadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Forbis v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API