Legal Opinion
Carl v. Galuska
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 5, 1992No. 90 C 3837PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOLDERMAN, District Judge:
Plaintiff, Joseph Ruby Carl,.brought this action against defendants Richard J. Galus-ka, Charles Davis, George Calvert, National Gas and Electric Corporation of America, National Gas Associates, Ltd. and Geo-quest, Inc. Plaintiff asserts claims under the federal securities statutes, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) statute, and pendent state law claims. Pro se defendant Galuska has moved, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b), 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss certain counts of the complaint.
For the reasons stated in this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,030 Henry T. Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Bernard A. Schlifke and Harvey Kallick, D/B/A K & S Investments Co., a Partnership v. Seafirst Corp. And Seattle-First National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Petri v. GatlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Epstein v. GaluskaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. S & K CHEVROLETDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1994
- Terrell v. ChildersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Gefen ex rel. Gefen v. Upjohn Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995