Legal Opinion

Epstein v. Galuska

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 27, 2005No. 1-04-1659PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Defendants Richard and Joy Lynn Galuska, husband and wife, appeal from the circuit court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Barry Epstein on his complaint for fraudulent conveyance brought under section 5 of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (740 ILCS 160/5 (West 2002)). For the reasons that follow, we dismiss defendants’ appeal.

The instant litigation stems from a 1992 lawsuit and subsequent judgment secured by plaintiff against Richard Galuska (Richard) to enforce guarantees and collect on several loans he had made to Richard in the 1980s. Richard’s partnership in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morris v. MargulisIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Twardowski v. Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  3. Cala v. GeramiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. In Re Estate of JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Boeger v. BoegerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Horlacher v. CohenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  2. North Community Bank v. 17011 South Park Ave, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  3. Oruta v. B.E.W.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  4. Mayster v. SantacruzAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  5. Rico Industries, Inc. v. TLC Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API