Legal Opinion

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 9, 1963No. 42PublishedCited by 776 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldberg

We are called upon in this case to decide whether under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 1 the Securities and Exchange Commission may obtain an injunction compelling a registered investment adviser to disclose to his clients a practice of purchasing shares of a security for his own account shortly before recommending that security for long-term investment and then immediately selling the shares at a profit upon the rise in the market price following the recommendation. The answer to this question turns on whether the practice — known in the trade as “scalping” — “operates as a fraud or…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Mosser v. DarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by776 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

771 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API