Legal Opinion

Kobata v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 6, 1971No. C.D. 4213PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Be, Judge:

The legal question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise imported from Japan in 1967. It is described on the invoices as “folding screen (byo'bu) ” or “paper screen, 4-panels”. The merchandise was classified by the customs officials as wood screens under item 206.67 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, and was assessed with duty at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem. The plaintiffs have protested the classification and claim that it is entitled to free entry since it is properly classifiable under…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. In Re the Estate of FindlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  4. United Enterprises v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Nomura (America) Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schott Optical Glass, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. John v. CARR & SON, INC. v. UNITED STATESUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Globemaster Midwest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Haan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. W & J SLOANE, INC. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API