Legal Opinion

Puhr v. Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1935No. 32,419PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, C. J.:

The action was one for damages for injury to real estate, consequent on erection of a municipal water tower and tank on adjoining land. A demurrer to the petition was overruled, and defendants appeal.

*705The city of Kansas City is a city of the first class, having the commission form of government. In July, 1924, the governing body enacted a zoning ordinance creating residence districts. The ordinance provided that no building or premises should be used and no building should be erected in a residence district, except for one or more…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shepler v. Kansas Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Whitfield v. Town of CarrolltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Liston v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williamson v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Brown v. Kansas Forestry, Fish & Game CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  3. Seely v. Board of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Reber v. South Lakewood Sanitation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Hagfeldt v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API