Brown v. Kansas Forestry, Fish & Game Commission
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Foth, C.J.:
The issue presented in this appeal is whether, in the absence of any clear legislative direction one way or the other, a state agency must conform its land use to local zoning regulations. It is an issue which has not been squarely answered by the courts of this state.
The agency involved here is the state forestry, fish and game commission. In 1975 it purchased two lots in the middle of a twenty-three lot subdivision near Manhattan, Kansas, which had been zoned for single family residences. The commission intended to use the land for a public parking lot, complete with toilet…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rutgers v. PilusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Askew v. KoppSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- City of Richmond v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
- Aviation Services, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Hanover Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- City of Pittsburgh v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Blackstone Park Improvement Ass'n v. State Board of Standards & AppealsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Native Village of Eklutna v. Alaska RailroadAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Johnson County Water Dist. No. 1 v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- South Hill Sewer District v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.