Reber v. South Lakewood Sanitation District
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
We will refer to defendant in error as the District, and to plaintiff in error as the intervenor. Other persons and governmental agencies involved will be referred to by name.
The District is organized under C.R.S. ’53, 89-5-1, et seq. Section 2 thereof declares that a sanitation district is one to provide for “ * * * disposal works and facilities and all necessary or proper equipment and appurtenances incident thereto, * * By section 13, broad powers are conferred upon the district, among which we find the following:
“(5) To borrow money and incur indebtedness and evidence the same by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Upper St. Clair TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- State Ex Rel. Askew v. KoppSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Aviation Services, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Hanover Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Town of Bloomfield v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Decatur Park District v. BeckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blue River Defense Com. v. Town of SilverthorneColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Board of County Commissioners v. Hygiene Fire Protection DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Hygiene Fire Protection District v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Board of County Commissioners v. Hygiene Fire Protection DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
- Hygiene Fire Protection District v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.