Legal Opinion

Liston v. Scott

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1921No. 22,819PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 2; Frank D. Hutchings, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

'The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.: The action was one for the abatement of a nuisance and for damages. The appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to the petition.

The plaintiff’s residence property in Kansas City adjoins that of the defendants. It was. alleged that the plaintiff maintains a concrete retaining wall at the rear of his premises; that defendants built a retaining wall on the same alley and filled in their premises from a depth of one foot to eighteen inches or more above the yard and premises of the plaintiff with a drain or slope toward plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Conner v. WoodfillIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hazeltine v. EdgmandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. RenfroSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  5. Bryant v. MerrittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williamson v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  2. Puhr v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API