Hagfeldt v. City of Bozeman
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gulbrandson
This is an appeal from an order of the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, granting the City of Bozeman’s (City) motion for summary judgment on grounds it sufficiently complied with statutory mandate in this class action claim brought by a number of Bozeman landowners (Landowners). We affirm. -
The only issue for consideration is whether the City legally complied with the requirements of Section 76-2-402, MCA (1987), when it constructed a water tank contrary to its zoning regulations.
Both parties agree there is no question of fact and summary judgment is appropriate as a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Rutgers v. PilusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Racing Guild of Ohio, Local 304 v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Richmond v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
- Aviation Services, Inc. v. Bd. of Adjustment of Hanover Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- City of Fargo, Cass Cty. v. Harwood TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Native Village of Eklutna v. Alaska RailroadAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Hagfeldt v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Native Village of Eklutna v. Alaska RailroadAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Town of Exeter, by and through its Solicitor, James P. Marusak v. State of Rhode Island Town of Richmond, Rhode Island v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2020
- Town of Exeter, by and through its Solicitor, James P. Marusak v. State of Rhode Island Town of Richmond, Rhode Island v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2020