Legal Opinion

Castle Estates v. Park & Planning Board of Medfield

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 9, 1962PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

This is an appeal under G. L. c. 41, § 81BB (as amended through St. 1957, c. 199, § 2), by Castle Estates, Inc. (Castle), the owner of land in Medfield, from a decision of that town’s planning board with respect to a subdivision plan filed by Castle. The board approved the plans “subject to three . . . conditions: 1. A suitable water distribution system [shall] be installed for domestic use and fire protection . . . connected to the public water supply system . . . and . . . subject to the approval of the . . . [w]ater and [s]ewerage [c]ommission. 2. A drainage easement must be obtained ...…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daley Construction Co. v. Planning Board of RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Pieper v. PLANNING BOARD OF SOUTHBOROUGH.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Doliner v. Planning Board of MillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Jenckes v. Building Commissioner of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  5. Doliner v. Town Clerk of MillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Fairbairn v. Planning Board of BarnstableMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  3. Green v. Board of Appeal of NorwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  4. North Landers Corp. v. Planning Board of FalmouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. McCravyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API