Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Mobile

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 31, 1979No. 77-779PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves the proposed resubdivision of a lot located in the old Springhill area of Mobile. The lot is owned by Mrs. Tula Fearn; suit was brought by her son-in-law, Arthur Smith, III, who is purchaser of the lot under contract. Mr. Smith proposes to divide the property into three irregular shaped lots on which townhouses would be built. The dimensions of the lots would exceed the minimum area requirements set out in the Planning Commission regulations.

The surrounding neighborhood is an old one, with many large lots, narrow, winding roads, abundant shrubbery and trees. In recent…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. RK Development Corp. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  2. Castle Estates v. Park & Planning Board of MedfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Knutson v. State Ex Rel. SebergerIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Pieper v. PLANNING BOARD OF SOUTHBOROUGH.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Boulder Corp. v. VannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ChapmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Swann v. Bd. of Zoning AdjustmentCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. City of Tuscaloosa v. BryanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Harry Kaufman & Gold Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning Comm.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. C & G Development v. Planning Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API