Legal Opinion

Doliner v. Planning Board of Millis

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 9, 1961PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

These two appeals from action of the planning board of Millis are brought under the subdivision control law, Gf. L. c. 41, §§ 81K to SIGrGr, as amended, see especially § 81BB. DoEner alleged in each appeal that he, as trustee, owned land in Millis and that, on April 8, 1959, he had applied for approval of a definitive subdivision plan. In one appeal filed June 2, 1959, Doliner also alleged that by letter dated May 26, 1959, the planning board had informed him of the disapproval of the plan for reasons stated below (see Doliner v. Town Clerk of Millis, post, p. 10). In the other appeal, filed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tilton v. City of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Daley Construction Co. v. Planning Board of RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Pieper v. PLANNING BOARD OF SOUTHBOROUGH.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Brucato v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Real Properties, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. School Committee of Springfield v. Board of EducationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  2. Castle Estates v. Park & Planning Board of MedfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Canter v. Planning Board of WestboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  4. Newbury Junior College v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  5. Smalley v. Planning Board of HarwichMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API