Legal Opinion

Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 2002No. A093061PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REARDON, J.

Introduction

In this case we hold that the compensability threshold established by Labor Code section 3208.3, subdivision (b)(1) 1 applies to any claim for psychiatric injury, whether or not it is related to a compensable physical injury. Employer Lockheed Martin Corporation (Lockheed) and its insurer, Bankers Standard Insurance Company (Bankers), petitioned for review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board or WCAB) reversing the finding of a workers’ compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) that employee applicant Virginia McCullough suffered no…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Mitchell v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Livitsanos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Granberry v. Islay InvestmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Hoschler v. Sacramento City Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. City of Oakland v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. E & J Gallo Winery v. the Worker's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API