E & J Gallo Winery v. the Worker's Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WISEMAN, J.
In this opinion we must determine the appropriate method of apportioning liability between two workers’ compensation injuries as conjured by the Legislature in reforming the workers’ compensation laws by enacting Senate Bill No. 899 (2003-2004 Reg. Sess.). We conclude that where an employee sustains multiple disabling injuries while working for the same self-insured employer, the employee is entitled to compensation for the total disability above any percentage of permanent disability previously awarded. In this narrow context, we see no reason to treat an employee who has…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Fuentes v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Wilkinson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brodie v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Chang v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Signature Fruit Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Nabors v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Duncan v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.