Legal Opinion

State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2008No. S149257PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

This case presents two related workers’ compensation issues; (1) When deciding whether to approve or deny an injured employee’s request for medical treatment, must an employer conduct utilization review pursuant to Labor Code section 4610?1 (2) As an alternative to utilization review, may an employer elect to dispute a request for medical treatment under section 4062, which permits an employer to object to “a medical determination . . . concerning any medical issues . . . not subject to Section 4610 . . .”? (§ 4062, subd. (a).) We conclude the Legislature intended to require…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Brodie v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ennabe v. ManosaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. King v. CompPartners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Stevens v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Koszdin v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API