Legal Opinion
Barry v. Duffin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 10, 1935PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
In November, 1931, the original defendant Kennedy became the general contractor for the building of a road in Boston for the Commonwealth. The plaintiff Barry, a dealer furnishing crushed stone and stone dust to Kennedy for the job, brought this bill under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 30, § 39, to obtain the benefit of security in the form of a bond upon which the defendant Maryland Casualty Company is surety and of money retained by the Commonwealth. Various subcontractors, and persons furnishing material to the contractor or a subcontractor, intervened for the purpose of sharing in the security.
The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Pearson v. MulloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Seemann v. EneixMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Rogers v. MurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Rosenblum v. Springfield Produce Brokerage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Massachusetts Gas & Electric Light Supply Co. v. Rugo Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Atlantic National Bank v. Hupp Motor Car Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Mario Pandolf Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Rubenstein v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Sanabia v. Travelers Insurance Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.