Legal Opinion
Mario Pandolf Co. v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 25, 1939PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
The Rendle Contracting Company, a respondent, hereinafter called the Rendle Company, made a contract with the Commonwealth for the construction of a bridge and a portion of a highway in the town of Bolton, and the Maryland Casualty Company, a respondent, hereinafter referred to as the surety company, executed a bond, as surety, to secure payment by the Rendle Company for labor performed or furnished, and for materials used or employed in the construction. This petition was brought under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 30, § 39, as amended by St. 1935, c. 472, § 1, to obtain the benefit of the security,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dodge v. Anna Jaques HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Peerless Unit Ventilation Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Cook Borden & Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co. v. W. H. Ellis & Son Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- General Fire Extinguisher Co. v. ChaplinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Massachusetts Gas & Electric Light Supply Co. v. Rugo Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- CC SMITH CO. INC. v. Frankini Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Lock Joint Pipe Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- International Business Machines Corp. v. Quinn Bros. Electrical Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. J. J. Grace & Son, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.